Meaning-Containing And Non-Meaning-Containing Anthroponymic Names As A Reflection Of Personal Worldview On The Example Of Three European Languages (English, Spanish, Russian).

Main Article Content

Podgornova Anna V. , Popova Larisa V. , Titova Olga K. , Kolycheva Vera B.

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by a comparative analysis of a new yet unexplored layer in the modern anthroponymicon, namely, the personal naming of e - mail addresses not only of Russian-speaking, but also of English-and Spanish-speaking users. In addition, our research focuses on the analysis of anthroponyms as a field of vocabulary with high cross-cultural and interdisciplinary significance and cognitive potential.
The purpose of the study is to determine similarities and differences of anthroponymic names in the names of e-mail addresses of Russian-speaking, English-speaking, Spanish-speaking users and whether there is a relationship with a personal name.
Tasks:
1) to distinguish two categories of personal names, namely: meaning-containing and non-meaning-containing anthroponymic names;
2) to present a word-formation classification of the names of e-mail addresses;
3) to classify virtual names in terms of distribution according to the needs and frequency of use of corporate and personal e-mail by respondents.
The practical significance of the work is that the results obtained during the analysis can be used in the development of training courses on word formation, onomastics, lexicology, computational linguistics, etc. The results of this study can also be useful to specialists in psycholinguistics, since the choice of a personal name bears the imprint of a personality and can help in making a psychological portrait of an individual.
The object of this research is anthroponymic naming as a virtual component of modern communication.

The subject of the study is the system-structural, functional and qualitative characteristics of anthroponymic names in relation to the intercultural context.
The scientific novelty consists in a comparative study of the use of anthroponymic names in electronic addresses on the example of three European linguistic cultures.
The results obtained in the course of the work showed that anthroponymic naming in three linguistic cultures can be divided into two large groups, namely: meaning-containing and non-meaning-containing anthroponymic names.

Article Details

Section
Articles